Transcrito

Freedom of Thought Conference, Panel 4: The NetChoice Problem

20 de jun. de 2024 · 1h 46m 18s
Freedom of Thought Conference, Panel 4: The NetChoice Problem
Descripción

We know how to think about government coercion. We have ready and familiar frameworks for evaluating how government power should be exercised against the private individual. But courts and policymakers...

mostra más
We know how to think about government coercion. We have ready and familiar frameworks for evaluating how government power should be exercised against the private individual. But courts and policymakers increasingly are called to mediate between private actors with competing claims to liberty, and the analysis is perhaps more complex and uncertain. How should we evaluate such competing claims and what are the self-governance interests of citizens themselves? Do we have a good framework for resolving conflicting interests of corporations and natural citizens, and what role or responsibility does the state have in resolving those disputes?

Jonathan Berry, Managing Partner, Boyden Gray PLLC
James Burnham, President, Vallecito Capital, LLC
Erin Hawley, Senior Counsel, Alliance Defending Freedom
Casey Mattox, Vice President, Legal Strategy, Stand Together
Prof. Todd Zywicki, George Mason University Foundation Professor of Law, Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University
Moderator: Hon. Trevor N. McFadden, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
mostra menos
Información
Autor The Federalist Society
Organización The Federalist Society
Página web -
Etiquetas
-

Parece que no tienes ningún episodio activo

Echa un ojo al catálogo de Spreaker para descubrir nuevos contenidos.

Actual

Portada del podcast

Parece que no tienes ningún episodio en cola

Echa un ojo al catálogo de Spreaker para descubrir nuevos contenidos.

Siguiente

Portada del episodio Portada del episodio

Cuánto silencio hay aquí...

¡Es hora de descubrir nuevos episodios!

Descubre
Tu librería
Busca