Explícito
Transcrito
How We Got Here: Jane Doe Lawyer's Doug Wigdor And His Letter Requesting That The Diddy Gag Order Is Denied
18 de feb. de 2025 ·
14m 22s
Descarga y escucha en cualquier lugar
Descarga tus episodios favoritos y disfrútalos, ¡dondequiera que estés! Regístrate o inicia sesión ahora para acceder a la escucha sin conexión.
How We Got Here: Jane Doe Lawyer's Doug Wigdor And His Letter Requesting That The Diddy Gag Order Is Denied
Esta transcripción es generada automáticamente. Ten en cuenta que no se garantiza una precisión absoluta.
Descripción
Douglas Wigdor, representing accuser Cassandra Ventura, submitted a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian opposing Sean "Diddy" Combs' request for a gag order in his federal case. Wigdor argued that while...
mostra más
Douglas Wigdor, representing accuser Cassandra Ventura, submitted a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian opposing Sean "Diddy" Combs' request for a gag order in his federal case. Wigdor argued that while Combs seeks to restrict public statements from accusers and their attorneys, his own family and legal team have been vocal in the media. He highlighted public comments from Combs' son, Quincy, and his mother, Janice Combs, as well as statements from Combs' attorney, Marc Agnifilo, who labeled the prosecution as racially motivated. Wigdor contended that if Combs' representatives are permitted to speak publicly, accusers and their legal counsel should have the same right, suggesting that Combs' request for a gag order is both hypocritical and unjust.
We also get a look at a letter sent by the prosecutors....
In a letter to Judge Subramanian regarding United States v. Sean Combs, the prosecution references a recent decision by Judge Ho in United States v. Adams, 24 Cr. 556 (DEH), as additional support for denying the defendant's motion concerning alleged leaks. The attached decision, labeled as Exhibit 1, is presented to bolster the government's position against the defendant's Leak Motion.
(commercial at 10:26)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.55.0.pdf
mostra menos
We also get a look at a letter sent by the prosecutors....
In a letter to Judge Subramanian regarding United States v. Sean Combs, the prosecution references a recent decision by Judge Ho in United States v. Adams, 24 Cr. 556 (DEH), as additional support for denying the defendant's motion concerning alleged leaks. The attached decision, labeled as Exhibit 1, is presented to bolster the government's position against the defendant's Leak Motion.
(commercial at 10:26)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.55.0.pdf
Información
| Autor | Bobby Capucci |
| Organización | Bobby Capucci |
| Página web | - |
| Etiquetas |
Copyright 2025 - Spreaker Inc. an iHeartMedia Company
Comentarios