Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance 542 U.S. 55 (2004)
18 de oct. de 2023 ·
39m 39s
Descarga y escucha en cualquier lugar
Descarga tus episodios favoritos y disfrútalos, ¡dondequiera que estés! Regístrate o inicia sesión ahora para acceder a la escucha sin conexión.
Descripción
Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance Holding that agency can be compelled to act if time period is specified by law.Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55 (2004),...
mostra más
Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
Holding that agency can be compelled to act if time period is specified by law.Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55 (2004), was a Supreme Court case that held that although the Administrative Procedure Actsays that a person may challenge an agency's failure to act, this provision essentially just carries forward the writ of mandamus. Thus an agency cannot be compelled to act unless there is some non-discretionary, discrete act.
(from Wikipedia)
mostra menos
Holding that agency can be compelled to act if time period is specified by law.Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55 (2004), was a Supreme Court case that held that although the Administrative Procedure Actsays that a person may challenge an agency's failure to act, this provision essentially just carries forward the writ of mandamus. Thus an agency cannot be compelled to act unless there is some non-discretionary, discrete act.
(from Wikipedia)
Información
| Autor | Danilo Feliciano |
| Página web | - |
| Etiquetas |
Copyright 2024 - Spreaker Inc. an iHeartMedia Company
