Explícito
Stacey Plaskett's Further Reply In Support Of Motion To Dismiss (9/18/24)
19 de sep. de 2024 ·
17m 14s
Descarga y escucha en cualquier lugar
Descarga tus episodios favoritos y disfrútalos, ¡dondequiera que estés! Regístrate o inicia sesión ahora para acceder a la escucha sin conexión.
Descripción
In Defendant Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett’s Reply in support of her Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Individual and Class Action Second Amended Complaint (Case 1:23-cv-10301-AS), Congresswoman Plaskett argues that the plaintiffs' claims...
mostra más
In Defendant Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett’s Reply in support of her Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Individual and Class Action Second Amended Complaint (Case 1:23-cv-10301-AS), Congresswoman Plaskett argues that the plaintiffs' claims should be dismissed for failing to meet legal standards required for their case to proceed. She contends that:
(commercial at 10:34)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.162.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)
mostra menos
- The claims are legally insufficient: The plaintiffs have not presented facts that would warrant the continuation of the lawsuit, especially against her in her official capacity.
- Qualified immunity: As a government official, Plaskett argues she is protected by qualified immunity, which shields public officials from lawsuits over actions performed within their official duties unless there’s a clear violation of constitutional rights.
- Failure to state a claim: The plaintiffs' allegations, even if accepted as true, do not establish a valid legal claim against her.
- No personal involvement or wrongdoing: Plaskett denies any direct involvement in the actions alleged by the plaintiffs, arguing that the complaint lacks specific allegations connecting her to any wrongdoing.
(commercial at 10:34)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.162.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)
Información
Copyright 2024 - Spreaker Inc. an iHeartMedia Company
